Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
5 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
13 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Engelhardt |
30 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Fiadjoe |
13 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Martin Soerensen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Engelhardt |
3 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Fiadjoe |
21 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Martin Soerensen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Fiadjoe |
28 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Martin Soerensen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
18 Apr 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Apr 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2253-12-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.