Skip to main content

Table 3 Number of intubation attempts and subjective assessment of handling with direct laryngoscopy (DL), C-MAC3, C-MAC4, and C-MAC4/SBT videolaryngoscopy.

From: A randomised, controlled crossover comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy in 150 patients during routine induction of anaesthesia

 

DL

C-MAC3

C-MAC4

C-MAC4/SBT

 

(n = 150)

(n = 150)

(n = 50)

(n = 100)

Number of intubation attempts

   

1

48/50 (96%)

27/37 (73%)

14/18 (78%)

33/45 (73%)

2

2/50 (4%)

10/37 (27%)

3/18 (17%)

8/45 (18%)

3

0*

0

1/18 (5%)

4/45 (9%)

Subjective assessment of handling (C/L < 3 with DL)

  

very good

85 (57%)

62 (41%)

12 (24%)

39 (39%)

good

49 (33%)

63 (42%)

34 (68%)

39 (39%)

poor

7 (5%)

16 (11%)

3 (6%)

14 (14%)

Subjective assessment of handling (C/L≥3 with DL)

  

very good

0 (0%)

2 (1%)

0 (0%)

2 (2%)

good

5 (3%)

4 (2%)

1 (2%)

4 (4%)

poor

4 (2%)

3 (2%)

0 (0%)

2 (2%)

Common concerns

   

comfort

6 (4%)

16 (11%)

2 (4%)

16 (16%)

guidance of laryngoscope handle

6 (4%)

13 (9%)

3 (6%)

14 (14%)

blade insertion

8 (5%)

12 (8%)

5 (10%)

9 (9%)

glottic exposure

26 (17%)

27 (18%)

8 (16%)

21 (21%)

  1. Data are given as absolute numbers (percentage). DL: Direct laryngoscopy. *Six patients that were originally ought to be intubated by DL showed limited glottic visualisation (C/L≥ 3) and had to be intubated with the C-MAC4 and straight blade technique.