Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A randomised, controlled crossover comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy in 150 patients during routine induction of anaesthesia

Original Submission
19 May 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Ray
22 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Cooper
28 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Erol Cavus
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Erol Cavus
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Cooper
24 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Ray
17 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Erol Cavus
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Cooper
24 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Ray
28 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Erol Cavus
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Cooper
11 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Ray
2 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Erol Cavus
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
11 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Erol Cavus
Resubmission - Version 7
11 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
1 Mar 2011 Editorially accepted
1 Mar 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2253-11-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page