Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Heath Latham |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 17 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 20 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pascal Meier |
| 29 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bruce McKinley |
| 25 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Heath Latham |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pascal Meier |
| 9 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bruce McKinley |
| 24 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Heath Latham |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 8 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Heath Latham |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 8 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 11 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Heath Latham |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2253-10-18 |
You can find further information about peer review here.