Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Nonintubated spontaneous ventilation versus intubated mechanical ventilation anesthesia for video-assisted thoracic surgery in terms of perioperative complications and practitioners’ workload assessments: a pilot randomized control study

Original Submission
30 Jun 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Jul 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olivier Imauven
8 Sep 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giulio Luca Rosboch
28 Sep 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Cheng-wen Li
2 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Cheng-wen Li
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Cheng-wen Li
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Cheng-wen Li
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Cheng-wen Li
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
3 Dec 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giulio Luca Rosboch
10 Jan 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Cheng-wen Li
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 6
26 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Cheng-wen Li
Resubmission - Version 7
26 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 7
27 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Cheng-wen Li
Resubmission - Version 8
27 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
4 Mar 2024 Editorially accepted
12 Mar 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12871-024-02481-1

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page