Evidence-based systematic review of removal of peripheral arterial catheter in critically ill adult patients

BMC Anesthesiology

Table 3 Results of CASE worksheet evaluation for evidence summaries included in the review

Evaluation item	Wang Yi et al [17]	Guo Han Hua et al [18]
1. Is the scope and application object of evidence summary specific?	Yes	Yes
2. Is the author of the evidence summary clear and transparent?	Yes	Yes
3. Is the reviewer or editor of the evidence summary clear and transparent?	Yes	Yes
4. Is the retrieval method transparent and comprehensive?	Yes	Yes
5. Is evidence graded and the grading system used transparent?	Yes	Yes
6. Are the recommendations clear?	Yes	Yes
7. Is the citation of the recommended opinion appropriate?	Partially yes	Yes
8. Are recommendations time-sensitive?	No	No
9. Does the evidence summary avoid potential bias?	Partially yes	Partially yes
10. Does this summary of evidence apply to your patient?	Yes	Yes
Additional entry: Was the quality of the included literature evaluated?	Yes	Yes

ISSN: 1471-2253