Skip to main content

Table 2 Subjects’ characteristics in accurate and inaccurate spinous interspace identification

From: Abdominal circumference but not the degree of lumbar flexion affects the accuracy of lumbar interspace identification by Tuffier’s line palpation method: an observational study

 

Actual interspace is one level lower than assumed

95% CI †

Actual interspace is the same as assumed

95% CI

Actual interspace is one level higher than assumed

95% CI

One-way ANOVA P value

Correlation analysis

Kendall’s tau-b(τ)

P value of the correlation

Height; cm

166.7 (8.3)

160.7,172.6

162.6 (7.4)

159.8,165.4

163.7 (5.8)

160.2,167.2

0.307

−0.070

0.535

Weight; kg

60.4 (13.1)

51.0,69.7

60.9 (9.6)

57.2,64.6

68.8 (11.8)

61.6,75.9

0.081

0.206

0.066

Abdominal Circumference; cm

82.8 (13.5)

73.1,92.4

85.0 (9.5)

81.3,88.6

94.0 (12.1)

86.6,101.3

0.029*

0.267

0.016**

BMI; kg/m2

21.6 (4.1)

18.7,24.6

22.9 (3.3)

21.7,24.2

25.9 (3.9)

23.5,28.2

0.015*

0.304

0.006**

Age; yrs

41.5 (15.8)

30.2,52.8

44.4 (14.6)

38.9,50.1

59.6 (9.0)

54.2,65.0

0.003*

0.342

0.002**

Cobb Angle in lateral position

2.9(0)

−0.6,6.4

6.2(7.5)

3.3,9.1

12.7(11.2)

5.9,19.4

0.016*

0.329

0.005**

Cobb Angle in hyperflexion position

17.5(8.7)

11.3,23.7

20.0(9.1)

16.5,23.4

23.5(15.1)

14.3,32.6

0.413

0.116

0.301

Cobb Angle between lateral and hyperflexion; degrees

14.6 (9.3)

7.9,21.3

13.7 (9.9)

10.0,17.5

10.8 (9.3)

5.2,16.4

0.573

−0.111

0.326

Distance from palpation point to iliac crest; mm

24.1 (18.6)

10.8,37.4

27.8 (20.7)

20.0,35.7

30.8 (19.1)

19.2,42.4

0.705

0.115

0.297

  1. Values are mean (SD).
  2. *P < 0.05 indicates a significant difference in one-way ANOVA that was used for comparing each cohort and analyzing variance, **P < 0.05 indicates the correlation is significant (2-tailed).† CI = Confidence Interval.