Table 4 The error grid with four zones demonstrating the level of agreement in cardiac index when comparing both Starling SV and LiDCOrapid with bolus thermodilution technique with a pulmonary artery catheter. The trending ability is optimal in zone 1, whereas in zone 4 the trending ability is poor
| Â | Starling SV | LiDCOÂ rapid | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Error grid zone | All n = 416 | Phase 1 n = 12 | Phase 2 n = 270 | Phase 3 n = 64 | Phase 4 n = 70 | All n = 402 | Phase 1 n = 8 | Phase 2 n = 262 | Phase 3 n = 63 | Phase 4 n = 69 |
Zone 1 | 32.5% | 16.7% | 40.7% | 18.8% | 15.7% | 35.2% | 37.5% | 40.5% | 20.6% | 27.5% |
Zone 2 | 14.4% | 33.3% | 13.7% | 9.4% | 18.6% | 14.9% | 12.5% | 13.7% | 17.5% | 17.4% |
Zone 3 | 34.4% | 16.7% | 31.5% | 40.6% | 42.9% | 34.3% | 37.5% | 28.6% | 49.2% | 42.0% |
Zone 4 | 18.8% | 33.3% | 14.1% | 31.3% | 22.9% | 15.7% | 12.5% | 17.2% | 12.7% | 13.0% |