From: Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale
Concept | Parameter | Abbreviation | Interpretation | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Construct validity | ||||
Correlation | Spearman's rho | rs | moderate | 0.40—0.69 |
strong | 0.70—0.89 | |||
very strong | 0.90—1.00 | |||
Reliability | ||||
Internal concistensy | Crohnbach's alpha | good | 0.70—0.90 | |
Split-half reliability | unaccaptable | < 0.70 | ||
fair | 0.70—0.79 | |||
good | 0.80—0.89 | |||
excellent | ≥ 0.90 | |||
Responsiveness | ||||
Cohen's effect size | large | ≥ 0.8 | ||
Standardised response mean | SRM | large | ≥ 0.8 | |
Reproducibility | ||||
Agreement | Individual smallest detectible change | SDC | good | SDC < minimal clinically |
important difference | ||||
Test–retest reliability | intraclass correlation coefficient | ICC | good | > 0.7 |
(two-way random effect model) | ||||
Clinical feasibility | ||||
Floor effect | Percentage of patients with | present | if > 15% | |
lowest possible score | ||||
Ceiling effect | Percentage of patients with | present | if > 15% | |
highest posible score |