Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of statistical methods used for the psychometric evaluation of the QoR-15NL scale

From: Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale

Concept

Parameter

Abbreviation

Interpretation

 

Construct validity

  Correlation

Spearman's rho

rs

moderate

0.40—0.69

   

strong

0.70—0.89

   

very strong

0.90—1.00

Reliability

  Internal concistensy

Crohnbach's alpha

 

good

0.70—0.90

 

Split-half reliability

 

unaccaptable

 < 0.70

   

fair

0.70—0.79

   

good

0.80—0.89

   

excellent

 ≥ 0.90

Responsiveness

 

Cohen's effect size

 

large

 ≥ 0.8

 

Standardised response mean

SRM

large

 ≥ 0.8

Reproducibility

  Agreement

Individual smallest detectible change

SDC

good

SDC < minimal clinically

    

important difference

  Test–retest reliability

intraclass correlation coefficient

ICC

good

 > 0.7

 

(two-way random effect model)

   

Clinical feasibility

  Floor effect

Percentage of patients with

 

present

if > 15%

 

lowest possible score

   

  Ceiling effect

Percentage of patients with

 

present

if > 15%

 

highest posible score