Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | BMC Anesthesiology

Fig. 4

From: A gap existed between physicians’ perceptions and performance of pain, agitation-sedation and delirium assessments in Chinese intensive care units

Fig. 4

RASS, SAS and Ramsay scores in patients receiving agitation/sedation assessment. Data are shown as individual points with median, interquartile range and range. A total of 99 patients received agitation/sedation evaluation with 47 and 52 in the brain-injured and non-brain-injured groups, respectively. The RASS (n = 78, 78.8%) was the most frequently used tool. The RASS score was significantly higher in the non-brain-injured group (0 [− 1 − + 1]) than that in the brain-injured group (− 2 [− 4–0], p < 0.001)

Back to article page

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us