Skip to main content

Table 4 Effect of sugammadex on the charge for anesthesia, net charge, and total charge, as compared to neostigmine, in patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, based on a propensity score-matched cohort

From: Comparison of the effects of sugammadex and neostigmine on hospital stay in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a retrospective study

Variable

Charge for anesthesia (USD)

Postoperative net chargea(USD)

Postoperative total charge(USD)

Median (IQR)

Odds ratio [95% CI]

P valueb

Median (IQR)

Odds ratio (95% CI)

P valuec

Median (IQR)

Odds ratio (95% CI)

P valued

Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine

343 (307–393) vs. 326 (291–361)

1.07 [1.04, 1.10]

< 0.001

2589 (2246–3347) vs. 2456 (2180–3179)

1.04 [1.00, 1.09]

0.061

10,875 (10055–11,843) vs. 11,588(9659–12,522)

0.98 [0.96, 1.00]

0.100

  1. IQR interquartile range
  2. aNet hospital charge: total hospital charge - charges for surgery and anaesthesia
  3. b,c,d Generalised linear model assuming gamma distribution and log link function was used, and P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant