Skip to main content

Table 4 Effect of sugammadex on the charge for anesthesia, net charge, and total charge, as compared to neostigmine, in patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, based on a propensity score-matched cohort

From: Comparison of the effects of sugammadex and neostigmine on hospital stay in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a retrospective study

Variable Charge for anesthesia (USD) Postoperative net chargea(USD) Postoperative total charge(USD)
Median (IQR) Odds ratio [95% CI] P valueb Median (IQR) Odds ratio (95% CI) P valuec Median (IQR) Odds ratio (95% CI) P valued
Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine 343 (307–393) vs. 326 (291–361) 1.07 [1.04, 1.10] < 0.001 2589 (2246–3347) vs. 2456 (2180–3179) 1.04 [1.00, 1.09] 0.061 10,875 (10055–11,843) vs. 11,588(9659–12,522) 0.98 [0.96, 1.00] 0.100
  1. IQR interquartile range
  2. aNet hospital charge: total hospital charge - charges for surgery and anaesthesia
  3. b,c,d Generalised linear model assuming gamma distribution and log link function was used, and P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant