Skip to main content

Table 3 Haemodynamic data

From: Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial

 

Group

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

SBP

Group I

124.17 ± 18.35

108.47 ± 11.12

109.23 ± 14.07c

115.13 ± 15.96

117.43 ± 14.40 c

mmHg

Group S

125.40 ± 12.09

114.10 ± 11.58

111.10 ± 13.28 c

116.03 ± 13.10

114.43 ± 11.20 c

 

Group T

124.97 ± 15.97

106.77 ± 13.40

125.60 ± 16.02a, c

113.17 ± 10.95

124.37 ± 11.52b, c

DBP

Group I

72.10 ± 10.76

64.60 ± 8.17

62.30 ± 10.33 c

68.03 ± 10.31

67.93 ± 9.15

mmHg

Group S

72.53 ± 7.66

64.90 ± 7.24

64.40 ± 9.13 c

67.30 ± 9.61

64.80 ± 7.30

 

Group T

69.13 ± 9.42

60.97 ± 8.64

73.83 ± 11.15a, c

64.27 ± 7.87

71.07 ± 7.57b

HR

Group I

77.40 ± 7.87

64.53 ± 6.45

65.70 ± 8.19 c

72.20 ± 10.23

70.63 ± 9.02b, c

bpm

Group S

78.07 ± 14.73

66.87 ± 8.35

66.80 ± 10.90 c

73.73 ± 10.72

74.00 ± 9.91 c

 

Group T

79.27 ± 13.70

65.40 ± 11.20

85.57 ± 13.57a, c

71.17 ± 7.27

85.73 ± 6.96b, c

  1. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Compare with T2, aP < 0.05, Compare with T4, bP < 0.05, Compare between three groups, cP < 0.05. Group I, Group I-gel; Group S, Group LMA Supreme; Group T, Group tracheal tube