Does the revised intubating laryngeal tube (ILTS-D2) perform better than the intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach)? – a randomised simulation research study

Table 2 Success rates. Success rates concerning extraglottic ventilation were 100% over all five attempts in both devices

Tracheal intubation		Success rate (%)	n success / n total	n missing
Attempt 1	Fastrach	100	63/63	0
Attempt 1	ILTS-D2	98	62/63	0
Attempt 2	Fastrach	100	63/63	0
Attempt 2	ILTS-D2	97	61/63	0
Attempt 3	Fastrach	98	62/63	0
Attempt 3	ILTS-D2	95	60/63	0
Attempt 4	Fastrach	98	61/62	1
Attempt 4	ILTS-D2	98	62/63	0
Attempt 5	Fastrach	100	63/63	0
Attempt 5	ILTS-D2	100	63/63	0

Success rates in percent (%) for the particular attempt exclusively concerning tracheal intubation. Number (n) of successful ventilations and total number (n total) of participants for the particular attempt. Number of missing data (n missing) for the particular attempt

ISSN: 1471-2253