Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Anesthesiology

Fig. 3

From: GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial

Fig. 3

Del and Ins represent Delivery and Insertion. As for NRS (scored from 0 to 10), difficulty score of DLT delivery was 5 (3 [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]) with the GlideScope, 3 (2 [0–6]) with the C-MAC(D) (p = 0.000), 2 (1.75 [0–3]) with the Macintosh (p = 0.000). C-MAC(D) vs the Macintosh (p = 0.001). Difficulty score of DLT insertion was 3 (3 [0–9]) with the GlideScope, 3 (1.75 [0–6]) with C-MAC(D) (p = 0.039) and 1 (2 [0–10]) with Macintosh (p = 0.001). C-MAC(D) vs Macintosh p = 0.026. aaP < 0.01, between the GlideScope and Macintosh groups; bbP < 0.01, between the C-MAC(D) and Macintosh groups; bP < 0.05, between the GlideScope and C-MAC(D) groups; ccP < 0.01, between the C-MAC(D) and Macintosh groups; cP < 0.05, between the C-MAC(D) and Macintosh groups

Back to article page

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us