Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment for each included cohort study

From: Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair in adult: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Item

Ismail M 2009 [10]

Sinha R 2008 [9]

Sunamak 2018 [12]

Symeonidis 2013

Yildirim D 2017 [14]

Item 1: The selection of the study groups

 Representativeness of the exposed cohort

 Selection of the non exposed cohort

 Ascertainment of exposure

 Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study

Item 2: The comparability of the groups

Item 3: The ascertainment of either the exposure or outcome of interest for cohort studies

 Assessment of outcome

 follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur

 Adequacy of follow up of cohorts

 

  1. : one means one score; each domain of Item 1 and 3 worth one , Item 2 worth two