Skip to main content

Table 3 Incremental cost-effectiveness of ultrasound guidance versus landmark method (base-case)

From: Cost-effectiveness-analysis of ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterization compared with landmark method: a decision-analytic model

Strategy

Costs (€)

Incremental costs (€)

Complications per person

Incremental effect (averted complications per person)

ICER (€ per averted complication)

Ultrasound guidance

51

−179

0.036

0.138

Dominatesa

Landmark method

230

 

0.175

  
  1. ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
  2. aUltrasound guidance is less costly and more effective in averting complications compared with landmark method