Skip to main content

Table 3 Study results by laryngoscope blades in the DA scenario

From: A comparison of two hyperangulated video laryngoscope blades to direct laryngoscopy in a simulated infant airway: a bicentric, comparative, randomized manikin study

p-values of Pairwise Differences

Outcomes

MaB

DB

MiB

KV

DB vs. MaB

DB vs. MiB

KV vs. MaB

KV vs. MiB

KV vs. DB

Time a Sequences (s)

 TTBV

11 [8.5–14]

8 [6.5–9]

13.5 [9–15.5]

6.5 [5–7]

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

 TTP

17.5 [15–20]

14 [11–15]

20.5 [16.5–24]

10 [9.5–12]

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

 TTV

23 20–26]

19 [16–21]

27 [22–31]

14 [13–16]

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

No. attemptsb

 1st

61/80 (76%)

74/80 (92%)

52/80 (65%)

80/80 (100%)

0.004

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.01

 2nd

16/80 (20%)

6/80 (8%)

23/80 (29%)

0

0.29

0.26

   

 Failed

3/80 (4%)

0

5/80 (6%)

0

     

Glottic view

 C&L 1/2/3b

19/60/1

61/19/0

7/70/3

77/3/0

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

 POGO (%)a

40 [30–60]

90 [90–100]

40 [30–60]

100 [90–100]

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

 ELMb

3/80 (4%)

1/80 (1%)

4/80 (5%)

0/80 (0%)

0.31

0.17

0.08

0.04

0.32

 BURP

0

0

0

0

     

 Neck extension

3/3 (100%)

1/1 (100%)

4/4 (100%)

      

 Degree ofa difficulty (1–5)

2 [2–3]

1 [1–2]

3 [3–3]

1 [1–1]

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.001

  1. aMedians and [IQR] are shown. Pairwise differences among devices were evaluated using the signed-rank test
  2. bAbsolute numbers (proportion) are shown. Pairwise differences among devices were evaluated using the chi-square test