Skip to main content

Table 1 Lin’s Concordance & Pearson Correlation Coefficients between the two methods: IAP & IBP for all measures (IAP = 0–22 mmHg) Versus High IAP (IAP > 12 mmHg)

From: Is intra-bladder pressure measurement a reliable indicator for raised intra-abdominal pressure? A prospective comparative study

Variable Y

Intra Abdominal Pressure (IAP = 0–22 mmHg)

Intra Abdominal Pressure (IAP > 12 mmHg)

Variable X

Intra Bladder Pressure (IBP with IAP = 0–22 mmHg)

Intra Bladder Pressure (IBP with IAP > 12 mmHg)

Sample size

388

81

Mean

IAP: 8.254

IBP: 8.351

IAP: 16.173

IBP: 16.455

Variance

IAP: 27.037

IBP: 29.318

IAP: 09.150

IBP: 15.764

Concordance correlation coefficient

0.965

0.903

95% Confidence interval

0.958 to 0.971

0.866 to 0.931

Pearson ρ (precision)

0.966

0.940

Significance level

P < 0.0001

P < 0.0001

Bias correction factor Cb (accuracy)

0.999

0.961