Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Observations on significant hemodynamic changes caused by a high concentration of epidurally administered ropivacaine: correlation and prediction study of stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in thoracic epidural anesthesia

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
23 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ya-Jung Cheng
25 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ayse Baysal
13 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elena Bignami
15 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jeong-Min Hong
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ya-Jung Cheng
10 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elena Bignami
20 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jeong-Min Hong
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ya-Jung Cheng
3 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elena Bignami
22 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jeong-Min Hong
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ya-Jung Cheng
6 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elena Bignami
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
8 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
16 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12871-017-0444-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement