Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Intrathecal magnesium sulfate does not reduce the ED 50 of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean delivery in healthy parturients: a prospective, double blinded, randomized dose-response trial using the sequential allocation method

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Mar 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ali Shahriari
3 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tulay Ozkan Seyhan
22 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Sullivan
18 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Fei Xiao
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ali Shahriari
2 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tulay Ozkan Seyhan
8 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Fei Xiao
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Fei Xiao
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Fei Xiao
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
17 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12871-017-0300-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement