Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Three suspected cases of sugammadex-induced anaphylactic shock

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jul 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Baldo
10 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guy Cammu
16 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean-Marc Malinovsky
17 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - MARCEL VERCAUTEREN
17 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lene Heise Garvey
15 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Tomonori Takazawa
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guy Cammu
9 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean-Marc Malinovsky
14 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lene Heise Garvey
11 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Tomonori Takazawa
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Sep 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guy Cammu
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
30 Sep 2014 Editorially accepted
17 Oct 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2253-14-92

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement