Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Veno-venous ECMO: a synopsis of nine key potential challenges, considerations, and controversies

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Sep 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Papadimos
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Chipman
28 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Lisco
18 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Papadimos
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Chipman
1 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Lisco
15 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Papadimos
Resubmission - Version 4
15 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Papadimos
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
30 Jul 2014 Editorially accepted
6 Aug 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2253-14-65

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement