Skip to main content

Table 2 Modified quality score for randomized trials

From: Transversus abdominis-plane block versus local anesthetic wound infiltration in lower abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Quality variables

Atim 2011

Sivapurapu 2013

Petersen 2013

Skjelsager 2013

Was study described as randomized, ie, used words such as “randomly”, “random”, and “randomization”? [0,1]

1

1

1

1

Was randomization described, and appropriate? [-1,0,1]

1

1

1

1

Was study described as double-blinded? [0,1]

1

0

1

1

Was method of blinding appropriate? [-1,0,1]

1

1

1

1

Was a description of withdrawals and dropouts included? [0,1]

1

0

1

1

Inclusion criteria

1

1

1

1

Exclusion criteria

1

1

1

1

Study period given

0

0

1

1

Appropriate statistical analysis

1

1

1

1

Hard end points

1

1

1

1

Sample size calculation

1

1

1

1

Baseline characteristics comparable

1

1

1

1

Any postoperative data missing?

1

1

1

1

Allocation concealment

1

0

1

1

Analysis by intention to treat

0

0

0

0

Score

13

10

14

14

  1. Score maximum = 15. Poor = -1 to 5, Fair = 6 to 10, Good = 11 to 15.
  2. -1 = inappropriate or inaccurate, 0 = not given/inadequate information, 1 = described and accurate.