This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Design of a prospective clinical study on the agreement between the Continuous GlucoseMonitor, a novel device for CONTinuous ASSessment of blood GLUcose levels, and the RAPIDLab® 1265 blood gas analyser: The CONTASSGLU study
- Johannes B Zimmermann1Email author,
- Monika Lehmann2,
- Stefan Hofer1,
- Johannes Hüsing2,
- Catharina Alles1,
- Jens Werner3,
- Jürgen Stiller4,
- Wolfgang Künnecke5,
- Steffen Luntz2,
- Johann Motsch†1 and
- Markus A Weigand†6
© Zimmermann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 August 2012
Accepted: 19 September 2012
Published: 22 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Johannes Zimmermann|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|22 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2253-12-24|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.