Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in severe sepsis: a systematic review and new cost-effectiveness analysis
© Costa and Brophy; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 12 March 2007
Accepted: 25 June 2007
Published: 25 June 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Mar 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christian Wiedermann|
|30 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Eichacker|
|26 Apr 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Jay Brophy|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Apr 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Eichacker|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|20 Jun 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Jay Brophy|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|20 Jun 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|25 Jun 2007||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jun 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2253-7-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.