Procalcitonin as a marker of sepsis and outcome in patients with neurotrauma: an observation study
© Deng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 10 July 2013
Accepted: 1 November 2013
Published: 15 December 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - shuixiang deng|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Meisner|
|24 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - oluwaseun akeju|
|26 Oct 2013||Author responded||Author comments - shuixiang deng|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|26 Oct 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 Oct 2013||Author responded||Author comments - shuixiang deng|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|27 Oct 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|1 Nov 2013||Editorially accepted|
|15 Dec 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2253-13-48|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.