Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Absence of neurotoxicity with perineural injection of ultrasound gels: assessment using an animal model

BMC Anesthesiology201313:18

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-18

Received: 17 April 2013

Accepted: 30 August 2013

Published: 3 September 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
17 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - abdelazeem dawlatly
12 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Betty Tyler
28 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Kirsch
17 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - David Belavy
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Kirsch
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Aug 2013 Editorially accepted
3 Sep 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2253-13-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Burns, Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital
The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute Pty Ltd, Princess Alexandra Hospital
Department of Pathology, Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital