The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement
© Borg Debono et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 30 January 2012
Accepted: 4 July 2012
Published: 4 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Jan 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mehmet Fatih Can|
|12 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Freedom Nkhululeko Gumedze|
|10 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lehana Thabane|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mehmet Fatih Can|
|18 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Freedom Nkhululeko Gumedze|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2253-12-13|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.