Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Renal effects of dexmedetomidine during coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized placebo-controlled study

  • Kari Leino1Email author,
  • Markku Hynynen2,
  • Jouko Jalonen1,
  • Markku Salmenperä3,
  • Harry Scheinin4,
  • Riku Aantaa1 and
  • the Dexmedetomidine in Cardiac Surgery Study Group
BMC Anesthesiology201111:9

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-11-9

Received: 11 August 2010

Accepted: 23 May 2011

Published: 23 May 2011

Abstract

Background

Dexmedetomidine, an alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist, has been evaluated as an adjunct to anesthesia and for the delivery of sedation and perioperative hemodynamic stability. It provokes dose-dependent and centrally-mediated sympatholysis. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with extracorporeal circulation is a stressful procedure increasing sympathetic nervous system activity which could attenuate renal function due the interrelation of sympathetic nervous system, hemodynamics and renal function. We tested the hypothesis that dexmetomidine would improve kidney function in patients undergoing elective CABG during the first two postoperative days.

Methods

This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Patients with normal renal function and scheduled for elective CABG were randomized to placebo or to infusion of dexmedetomidine to achieve a pseudo steady-state plasma concentration of 0.60 ng/ml. The infusion was started after anesthesia induction and continued until 4 h after surgery. The primary endpoint was creatinine clearance. Other variables included urinary creatinine and output, fractional sodium and potassium excretion, urinary potassium, sodium and glucose, serum and urinary osmolality and plasma catecholamine concentrations. The data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA or Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test.

Results

Sixty-six of 87 randomized patients were evaluable for analysis. No significant between-group differences were recorded for any indices of renal function except for a mean 74% increase in urinary output with dexmedetomidine in the first 4 h after insertion of a urinary catheter (p < 0.001). Confidence interval examination revealed that the sample size was large enough for the no-difference statement for creatinine clearance.

Conclusions

Use of intravenous dexmedetomidine did not alter renal function in this cohort of relatively low-risk elective CABG patients but was associated with an increase in urinary output.

This study was carried out in 1994-1997 and was thus not registered.

Background

Perioperative administration of alpha2-adrenergic agonist dexmedetomidine, has been shown to reduce anesthetic requirements, enhance hemodynamic stability and provide sedation during postoperative recovery following coronary artery bypass and other surgery [16]. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a recognized complication of cardiovascular surgery and one associated with high mortality and costs-of-care [7]. The pathogenesis of AKI is multifactorial and involves hemodynamic, inflammatory and nephrotoxic components [7]. It is also known that hemodynamics, sympathetic nervous system activity and renal function are tightly interrelated. Since cardiac surgery is associated with activation of sympathetic nervous system [3], dexmedetomidine-induced sympatholysis might attenuate harmful hemodynamic events resulting in prevention of AKI. In fact, alpha2-adrenoceptor activation does produce some potentially renal-protective effects including inhibition of renin release, increased glomerular filtration and increased secretion of sodium and water [8, 9]. Moreover, pretreatment with clonidine, the archetype of alpha2-adrenergic agonists, has shown beneficial renal effects after cardiac surgery [10]. In an earlier study we found that urine output tended to be greater in patients receiving dexmedetomidine than in those receiving placebo in post-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients [3].

To date, no single pharmacological regimen has conclusively proved its efficacy in preventing AKI [7] and any potential means to decrease the number of cardiac surgery patients encountering this deleterious adverse effect should be sought. We conducted a study to test the hypothesis that dexmedetomidine could protect kidney function in patients undergoing CABG with extracorporeal circulation (ECC). This study reports renal effects of dexmedetomidine compared to placebo.

Methods

This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study designed to compare dexmedetomidine, administered as a continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion at rates needed to achieve a pseudo steady-state plasma concentration of 0.60 ng/ml, with placebo in terms of renal effects. Altogether 93 patients were screened and 87 were randomized to receive the study treatment (Figure 1) in two study centers, Helsinki and Turku University Hospitals. Selection of the target concentration for dexmedetomidine was based on previous experience in CABG patients [3].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2253-11-9/MediaObjects/12871_2010_Article_104_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Summary of patient disposition.

The study was performed according to Helsinki Declaration and standards of Good Clinical Practise. The protocol and amendments were reviewed and approved by separate Ethics Committees of Turku and Helsinki Universities and the Finnish Medicines Agency. All patients provided written informed consent. Adult (aged > 21 years) patients undergoing scheduled elective CABG surgery at the two study centers were candidates for inclusion in the study if they had normal renal function and serum creatinine (S-Crea) < 115 μmol/l, were of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III or IV, and met the general participation criteria for the study. Patients were not admitted to the study if they had left main coronary artery occlusion > 50%, valvular dysfunction necessitating operation, hemodynamically significant arrhythmia, or left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%. Other exclusion conditions included: treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or diuretics; use of alpha2-agonists to treat hypertension; untreated hypertension; cerebrovascular disease; type 1 diabetes mellitus or diabetes insipidus; morbid obesity; evidence or suspicion of abnormal liver function due to drug abuse or alcoholism; a history of severe allergy to drugs; and previous exposure to dexmedetomidine. Pregnant or breastfeeding women were ineligible, as were women of childbearing age not using reliable contraceptive methods. Randomization was performed by an independent statistician using random permuted blocks of 10 patients within each center. Both centers were provided with indistinguishable ampoules of dexmedetomidine and placebo to be allotted in numerical order to consecutive patients enrolled by study physicians. All patients, personnel and investigators including the persons responsible for data management and statistics were blinded to the treatment assignment. The code was opened only after recruitment and data collection of all study patients had been completed.

Study outline and measurements

All patients received zopiclone 7.5 mg orally the night before surgery. Oral lorazepam 4-6 mg was administered 2 h before induction of anesthesia.

Patients were instrumented upon arrival in the operating theater, including the introduction of a pulmonary artery catheter. Ringer's acetate was infused intravenously at 10 ml · kg-1 · h-1 until commencement of ECC. Baseline hemodynamic and blood chemistry measurements were obtained after at least 5 min of stabilisation after catheterisation. Anesthesia was induced with 30 μg/kg fentanyl given as a 5-min i.v. infusion and co-administered with i.v. lorazepam 2 mg. Pancuronium 0.1 mg/kg was then administered i.v. and a urinary catheter introduced. All urine passed during the 48 h after catheter insertion was collected.

Study drug infusion was commenced immediately after anesthesia induction, and continued until 4 h after arrival in the intensive care unit (ICU). To reach and maintain a constant pseudo steady-state plasma concentration of 0.60 ng/ml of dexmedetomidine a five-step infusion of 4.0 μg/ml dexmedetomidine or placebo with the following decreasing infusion rates was used: 39.0 ml/h for 20 min, 24.5 ml/h for 40 min, 14.0 ml/h for 60 min, 10.5 ml/h 120 min and 7.0 ml/h from that on. The dosing was based on our previous experience with dexmedetomidine in CABG patients [3] and simulation with data available from Talke et al. [11].

CABG was performed under ECC using moderate systemic hypothermia (nasopharyngeal temperature 30°C), a standardized protocol and mannitol 150 mg/ml 100 ml added to ECC priming. ECC was initiated at a flow rate of 2.4 l min-1 · m-2 and reduced to 1.8 l min-1 · m-2 during hypothermia. Cold crystalloid potassium cardioplegic solution was used as required to maintain asystole.

Intraprocedural anaesthesia was maintained with fentanyl 0.1 μg · kg-1 · min-1 until rewarming (rectal temperature 35°C). Isoflurane was administered into the perfusion unit at an inspiratory concentration of 0.2%. Patients were ventilated with 40-60% oxygen in air with a target arterial CO2 tension of 35-45 mmHg (not corrected to the patient's temperature) and oxygen saturation (SaO2) > 95%. Fentanyl and isoflurane were discontinued after skin closure.

Cardiovascular parameters and clinical signs were used as indicators of anesthetic depth. Specific provisions and interventions were developed in the study protocol to maintain a sufficient level of anesthesia and acceptable hemodynamics, to prevent tachycardia, bradycardia, hypertension or hypotension lasting 1 min or more and manage low urinary output intraoperatively and postoperatively. These criteria and the respective therapeutic interventions are summarized in table 1. Deviations in other hemodynamic parameters were dealt with as a part of standard clinical practice. Post-CABG, patients were transferred to the ICU, where they were ventilated and weaned from respirator according to standard ICU protocols.
Table 1

Protocol-specified intraoperative and postoperative interventions for maintenance of hemodynamic and anesthetic stability, and correction of low urinary output

Tachycardia*

  

   Before ECC

HR > 90 beats/min

Esmolol in increments of 0.5 mg/kg i.v.

   After ECC

HR > 110 beats/min

As above

   In the ICU

HR > 120 beats/min

Esmolol 0.5 mg/kg i.v. If HR decreased < 120 beats/min, give metoprolol 1-5 mg i.v.

Bradycardia

  

   Before ECC

HR < 40 beats/min

Glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg i.v.

   After ECC

HR < 70 beats/min

As above

   In the ICU

HR < 60 beats/min

Pacing at 70 beats/min

Hypertension**

  

   Before ECC

SAP > 150 mmHg

Increase ET-IF by 0.4% and administer 50 μg i.v. bolus of glyceryl trinitrate. If response not adequate within 4 min, increase ET-IF a further 0.4% and give 5 μg/kg i.v. bolus of fentanyl. If still not adequate, increase ET-IF by 0.4% and give 50 μg i.v. bolus of glyceryl trinitrate.

Taper isoflurane (to 0.2% ET-IF) when SAP and HR have reached predetermined values with no clinical signs of insufficient anaesthesia. If SAP or HR rises again, increase ET-IF by 0.4% and give 50 μg i.v. glyceryl trinitrate.

   During ECC

MAP > 80 mmHg

As above

   After ECC

SAP > 130 mmHg

As above

   In the ICU

SAP > 150 mmHg

Start glyceryl trinitrate infusion to effect.

Hypotension

  

   Before ECC

SAP < 90 mmHg

Reduce ET-IF 0.4% per 4 min until ET-IF 0.2%. If not sufficient to restore SAP, administer ephedrine 2.5 mg i.v. bolus. If SAP response still not adequate repeat ephedrine bolus plus 250 ml i.v. bolus of hydroxyethylstarch (or 500 ml of Ringer's acetate).

If necessary, repeat this intervention once, 4 min after first administration. If SAP response still not adequate, start epinephrine infusion at 0.03 μg · kg-1 · min-1; titrate to maximum of 0.3 μg · kg-1 · h-1. Taper epinephrine when SAP remains within protocol-specified values.

   During ECC

MAP < 30 mmHg

i.v. bolus doses of phenylephrine (0.2 mg)

   After ECC

SAP < 80 mmHg

As for 'Before ECC'

   In the ICU

SAP < 90 mmHg

250 ml i.v. bolus of hydroxyethylstarch (or 500 ml of Ringer's acetate) over 10 min. If effective, repeat. Otherwise start epinephrine at a rate of 3 μg · kg-1 · min-1

Clinical signs of light anaesthesia

E.g. bucking, lacrimation, sweating, movement, eye opening, grimacing

As for management of hypertension

Low urinary output

 

   Before ECC

Urinary output < 1 ml · kg-1 · h-1 during a 30 min period, when SAP above threshold for hypotension

250 ml i.v. bolus of hydroxyethylstarch (or 500 ml of Ringer's acetate) over 10 min. If response not sufficient, repeat twice.

If response not sufficient 15 min after third bolus, administer furosemide 5 mg i.v. every 30 min until effect is produced

   During ECC

Urinary output < 1 ml · kg-1 · h-1 during a 30 min period, MAP > 30 mmHg

Phenylephrine 0.2 mg i.v. bolus dose, repeated up to 3 times until MAP ≥ 50 mmHg.

If urinary response not sufficient despite MAP ≥ 50 mmHg for 30 min, administer furosemide 5 mg i.v. every 30 min until effect is produced

   After ECC

As for 'Before ECC'

As for 'Before ECC'

   In the ICU

Urinary output < 1 ml · kg-1 · h-1

250 ml i.v. bolus of hydroxyethylstarch (or 500 ml of Ringer's acetate) over 10 min. If response not sufficient, give furosemide 5 mg i.v. at 30 min intervals

*Without hypertension; **with or without tachycardia or clinical signs of inadequate anaesthesia. ECC = extracorporeal circulation; HR = heart rate;

ET-IF = end-tidal concentration of isoflurane; ICU = intensive care unit, MAP = mean arterial pressure; SAP = systolic arterial pressure.

Creatinine clearance

The primary endpoint of the study was renal function assessed by determination of creatinine clearance at 12-24 h prior to surgery, and 0-24 h and 24-48 after urinary catheter insertion after induction of anesthesia. Creatinine clearance was defined as (U-Crea) × (urine output)/S-Crea, where U-Crea and S-Crea represent urinary and serum creatinine, respectively.

Other variables of renal function

Creatinine clearance from 30 min urine output at 4-h intervals was quantified. Cumulative and 4-hourly urinary output was examined. Fractional sodium excretion (dU-Na) and fractional potassium excretion (dU-K) were determined at the same time as creatinine clearance. Urine samples for determination of urinary potassium (U-K), urinary sodium (U-Na), U-Crea, urinary glucose (U-Gluc) and urinary osmolality (U-Osmol) were taken after urinary catheter insertion, 1 min after aortic cross clamp removal and 24 and 48 h after urinary catheter insertion. In addition samples for determination of U-Na and U-Crea were taken at 4 h intervals until 24 h from catheter insertion.

Plasma cathecolamines

Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography with coulometric detection [12].

Statistical analyses

Forty patients per treatment group were needed to get a 80% power to detect a 35% difference between the treatment groups with a 5% (two-sided) type I error rate and assuming a standardized effect size (expected effect size divided by SD of the outcome variable) of 0.63. Assuming a 10% drop-out rate, the final sample size was set at 88 patients (44/group).

The analysis of renal function was based on patients meeting the following five criteria of evaluation: (i) study drug infusion commenced within 30 min after anesthesia induction and continued intraoperatively and 2-4 h postoperatively; (ii) preoperative and one other perioperative 24 h creatinine clearance value obtained; (iii) no reoperation during the study period; (iv) no development of myocardial dysfunction requiring inotropes or intra-aortic balloon pump support; and (v) extubation within 24 h post-CABG. A supplementary analysis of creatinine clearance was also carried out, based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) population of 87 patients.

Creatinine clearance was analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA with treatment and center as grouping factors and time as a within factor. Perioperative dU-Na, total and cumulative urine volume, S-Crea, U-Crea, serum and urinary electrolytes (serum potassium [S-K], serum sodium [S-Na], urinary potassium [U-K], urinary sodium [U-Na serum and urinary osmolarity (S-Osmol, U-Osmol) and blood glucose were examined in a similar way. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test was used for urinary glucose, requirement, plasma catecholamines and requirements for postoperative cardiac pacing.

Results

The study was carried out in years 1994-1997 and prematurely terminated due to slow recruitment rate towards the end of the study. After opening the study code it turned out that a total of 93 Caucasian patients had been screened for eligibility, of which 87 had been randomized: 44 to receive dexmedetomidine and 43 to receive placebo. Twenty-one of the randomized patients (dexmedetomidine, n = 9; placebo, n = 12) did not fulfill the evaluation criteria. Analysis of creatinine clearance was thus based on 66 evaluable patients (dexmedetomidine, n = 35; placebo, n = 31). The disposition of patients is illustrated in figure 1.

Table 2 summarizes demographic and other baseline characteristics of the evaluable patients (n = 66) in the two study groups. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding concurrent and preoperative cardiac medications, baseline laboratory data, duration of anesthesia during CABG, time to extubation or duration of study drug infusion. Mean artery pressure (MAP) was 86 ± 9 mmHg in the dexmedetomidine group and 82 ± 8 mmHg in the placebo group (p = 0.015) prior to ECC. During ECC MAP was 55 ± 7 mmHg and 58 ± 8 mmHg (p = 0.064) in dexmedetomidine and placebo groups, respectively. After ECC until admission to ICU MAP was 68 ± 6 mmHg in the dexmedetomidine group and 73 ± 9 mmHg (p = 0.019) in the placebo group. Postoperatively systolic blood pressure was measured instead of MAP up to 24 h from admission to ICU being 109 ± 10 mmHg and 111 ± 10 mmHg (p = 0.44) in dexmedetomidine and placebo groups, respectively. The total volume of intraoperative Ringer's acetate administered was 5215 ± 913 ml in the dexmedetomidine group and 4996 ± 1105 ml (p = 0.21) in the placebo group. The postoperative volumes of Ringer's acetate in the ICU up to 24 h from urinary catheter insertion were 2942 ± 1084 ml and 2958 ± 1037 ml (p = 0.41) in dexmedetomidine and placebo groups, respectively. The intraoperative hydroxyethyl starch volumes were 344 ± 309 ml and 419 ± 440 ml (p = 0.97) and postoperatively 1064 ± 385 ml and 968 ± 451 ml (p = 0.47) in dexmedetomidine and placebo groups, respectively. The average blood loss during the first 16 h after CABG was 1104 ± 376 ml with dexmedetomidine and 904 ± 307 ml with placebo (p = 0.023). Twenty-five patients in both groups needed postoperative defibrillation, equating to 71% of dexmedetomidine-treated patients and 81% of patients in the placebo group (p = 0.56 for overall comparison between groups). Eighteen dexmedetomidine patients and eight placebo patients needed postoperative pacing (p = 0.028). As this study focuses on the renal effects of dexmedetomidine and hemodynamics were strictly guided by the study protocol (Table 1), hemodynamics are not reported.
Table 2

Patient demographics, operation data and baseline hemodynamics

 

Dexmedetomidine (n = 35)

Placebo (n = 31)

Men

31

28

Women

4

3

Age (years)

59.5 ± 8.5

62.4 ± 7.0

Weight (kg)

83.7 ± 11.9

79.7 ± 8.7

Body surface area (m2)

1.97 ± 0.17

1.92 ± 0.11

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

142 ± 21

138 ± 21

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

73 ± 11

71 ± 9

Heart rate (beats/min)

61 ± 13

60 ± 7

ASA grade

  

   III

2

0

   IV

33

31

NYHA classification

  

   II

12

12

   III

22

17

   IV

1

2

Operation time (min)

213 ± 55

190 ± 38

Perfusion time (min)

107 ± 29

96 ± 22

Number of grafts

3 ± 0.7

3 ± 0.6

Time to extubation (min)

1114 ± 248

1193 ± 283

Data are presented as number of subjects or mean ± SD. Data are based on the per-protocol cohort (n = 66). ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; NYHA = New York Heart Association.

Creatinine clearance

Perioperative creatinine clearance increased in both groups during the study period (0-24-48 h), with a significant time effect (p < 0.001) but without significant difference between the groups (p = 0.93) (Figure 2). Mean maximal increases were 15.2% and 26.2% in the dexmedetomidine and placebo groups, respectively, with no significant difference between groups. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for group differences were from -16.80 to 7.86 ml · min-1 · 1.73 m-2 in the first 24 h after catheter insertion and from -11.34 to 13.44 ml · min-1 · 1.73 m-2 in the second 24 h (i.e. 24-48 h after catheter insertion). Analysis based on ITT population revealed that perioperative creatinine clearance (0-24-48 h) increased in both groups similarly to evaluable patients with a significant time effect (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.77). Mean maximal increases were 12.4% and 20.4% in the dexmedetomidine and placebo groups, respectively, with no significant difference between groups. The 95% CIs for differences between the treatment groups were from -15.28 to 8.88 ml · min-1 · 1.73 m-2 in the first 24 h after catheter insertion and from -9.05 to 15.38 ml · min-1 · 1.73 m-2 24-48 h after catheter insertion.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2253-11-9/MediaObjects/12871_2010_Article_104_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Perioperative creatinine clearance during the period in the per-protocol cohort (primary efficacy endpoint). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. P < 0.001 for time-trend in both groups; no significant differences between the groups.

Other variables of renal function

There was no significant intergroup difference in creatinine clearance calculated at 4-h intervals (Figure 3A). Mean urinary output per 24 h increased from 1408 ± 623 ml before surgery to 5599 ± 1386 ml during the 24 h following catheter insertion in the dexmedetomidine group and from 1314 ± 487 ml to 4497 ± 840 ml in the placebo group (p < 0.001 between groups). Urinary volumes 24-48 h after catheter insertion were 2799 ± 757 ml and 2938 ± 1037 ml, respectively (p = 0.67). Furosemide was administered according to the conditions specified in the protocol to stimulate urine production in 22 dexmedetomidine-treated patients and 23 placebo-treated patients (p = 0.32). The median dose was 5 mg in both groups. Urinary output was also analyzed at 4-h intervals. In paired comparisons, the urinary outputs in the first (0-4 h) and third (8-12 h) fractions were significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group when compared to placebo (p < 0.05). The mean urinary output in the first fraction was 74% greater in the dexmedetomidine group (Figure 3B; p < 0.001 vs. placebo). Fractional sodium excretion increased several-fold in both groups during and after surgery (Figure 3D).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2253-11-9/MediaObjects/12871_2010_Article_104_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Perioperative renal parameters. Creatinine clearance (A) and urinary output (B) in 4-h episodes. Serum creatinine (C) and fractional sodium excretion (D) during the perioperative period. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. CCR = cross clamp removal.

Perioperative S-K and S-Na values were quite similar in both groups. Dexmedetomidine patients had slightly higher serum electrolyte levels towards the end of follow-up (treatment-time interactions; p = 0.0045 for S-K; p < 0.001 for S-Na) without the effect of time or treatment. Likewise, no treatment effect or effect of time in the ANOVA was noticed, but there was a treatment-time interaction for U-K (p = 0.0027). No effect of time, treatment or treatment-time interaction for U-Na was found. There was also a treatment effect on U-K (p = 0.0027 dexmedetomidine vs. placebo) at 48 h after catheter removal but not at earlier times.

Perioperative S-Crea was relatively stable, with no significant differences between the groups (Figure 3C). U-Crea first fell by > 80% from baseline in both groups thereafter gradually recovering with an overall time effect (p < 0.001). There were no overall treatment effect between the groups in S-Osmol and U-osmol (Table 3). Time-dependent changes in blood and urine concentrations of glucose were seen in both groups (p < 0.001).
Table 3

Serum and urine osmolality

 

Dexmedetomidine

Placebo

 

S-Osmol mosm/kg

U-Osmol mosm/kg

S-Osmol mosm/kg

U-Osmol mosm/kg

5 min after cannulation

291 ± 4

583 ± 178

292 ± 4

625 ± 152

1 min after cross clamp removal

295 ± 4

326 ± 93

293 ± 5

353 ± 80

24 h after urinary catheter insertion

296 ± 9

618 ± 117

290 ± 7

649 ± 85

48 h after urinary catheter insertion

294 ± 7

579 ± 128

295 ± 19

506 ± 84

There were no significant differences between the groups, effect of time or treatment-time interaction in serum osmolality (S-Osmol). Urine osmolality (U-Osmol) initially decreased in both groups (p < 0.001 for time effect) without treatment effect. However, there was a significant treatment-time interaction in the ANOVA (p = 0.024) and in paired comparisons dexmedetomidine patients had significantly higher values 48 h after urinary catheter insertion (p = 0.02)

Plasma catecholamines

CMH test showed a significant difference between the groups in perioperative epinephrine concentrations (p < 0.001) although the concentrations were quite similar in both treatment groups (Figure 4). Plasma norepinephrine concentrations were significantly smaller in the dexmedetomidine-treated patients (p < 0.001; Figure 4).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2253-11-9/MediaObjects/12871_2010_Article_104_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations during the perioperative period. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.

Discussion

Although urinary output increased and plasma norepinephrine decreased in these relatively low-risk elective CABG patients during dexmedetomidine treatment, we were not able to demonstrate a significant dexmedetomidine-related benefit in terms of renal function as evaluated with creatinine clearance. In spite of the fact that the targeted number of evaluable patients was not reached, the confidence intervals for group differences in creatinine clearance clearly demonstrate that our sample size was adequate for a negative (no difference) conclusion. Because of smaller than anticipated variance in the primary endpoint, we can exclude a larger than 15% difference between the groups. We argue that such a small difference would hardly have clinical significance. It should also be noted that the protocol stipulated the attainment and maintenance of a dexmedetomidine plasma level of 0.6 ng/ml, which is at the lower end of the preferred therapeutic concentration [13]. Nevertheless, we did not measure the true individual plasma concentrations nor did we consider the true body weight of the patients in dose calculation. Thus, there has likely been some interindividual differences in the true plasma concentrations. Further trials may be warranted to examine the effect of higher and weight-based dexmedetomidine dosing on indices of renal function in higher risk patients.

Postoperative AKI is a relatively rare complication of CABG but has a profoundly disadvantageous impact on short-term (< 30 day) prognosis. In-hospital mortality rates of 40% and more have been reported in several series of patients, compared with rates of around 1% in patients without kidney insufficiency [1417]. Loef et al. [17] have also reported a more than 10-fold increase in short-term mortality with postoperative kidney insufficiency and, in contrast to some other investigators [18, 19], have linked postoperative AKI to reduced longer-term survival. A recent review endorses the contribution of AKI as an independent factor associated with substantial morbidity and mortality following cardiopulmonary bypass [7].

In the present study, creatinine clearance was determined by direct measurement. We are supportive of assertion of Holzmann and colleaques that indices of clearance may be preferable to serum creatinine levels as an indicator of renal function [20]. Others have advocated markers such as cystatin C as an alternative means of monitoring renal function [21]. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate might also be considered as it is part of the proposed RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss and end stage kidney disease) classification for determination of AKI [22]. We can state that according to urinary output and serum creatinine, there were no patients fulfilling the definition of AKI according to RIFLE in the present study.

Renal effects of alpha2-adrenergic agonists in clinical settings have not been studied thoroughly so far. Pretreatment with the archetypal alpha2-adrenergic agonists, clonidine, has shown preventive effects of renal function expressed as creatinine clearance after cardiac surgery [10]. Nevertheless, clonidine is a less selective alpha2-adrenergic agonist than dexmedetomidine and has somewhat different pharmacodynamic profile [1].

Attenuated response of sympathetic nervous system to CABG has been suggested as a potential benefit of alpha2-adrenergic agonists. Our results regarding norepinephrine support this assumption as plasma norepinephrine was reduced at various time points during the study. However, these indications of reduced sympathetic activity might have also an influence on the greater blood loss in the dexmedetomidine group compared to the placebo group, since high adrenergic output favours thrombosis. On the other hand, the relatively low number of patients and the nature of the surgery might also predispose evaluation of blood loss to type I error. More postoperative pacing was needed in dexmedetomidine group which most probably is attributable to the direct effect of dexmedetomidine on cardiac conduction times [23].

The enhancement of urinary output with dexmedetomidine during the first 24 h after catheter insertion is favourable for dexmedetomidine, though it does not necessarily indicate a preserved renal function. Nevertheless, there was an increase of creatinine clearance from baseline in both groups and the increase was 11% higher in the placebo group, though this difference did not reach statistical significance. The increase seen in both treatment groups in creatinine clearance might have been an artifact resulting from diurnal variation [24], as baseline creatinine clearance was usually determined from 12-h night time urine samples rather than from a 24-h sample. Eventual problems in spontaneous voiding might also have resulted in systematic but likely similar underestimation of baseline creatinine clearance in both groups. Increased urine output is a recognized property of dexmedetomidine and demonstrated already earlier in patients undergoing CABG by us [3] and more recently by others in patients undergoing thoracotomy [25]. The diuretic action of dexmedetomidine evident also in the present study is consistent with sympatholysis-attenuated sodium reabsorption in tubular cells via alpha2-adrenergic action [26]. We did not however, control or record fluid administration at the regular ward during the second postoperative day. This may have added irregularities in individual fluid management and thus urine output during that period.

The fact that we included patients at a relatively low risk of AKI may limit the interpretation of the results. In addition, we had a high drop-out rate of 21 patients due to the complexity of the study protocol. Nevertheless, all patients were included in the ITT analyses for the main end-point which were essentially the same as the per-protocol analyses.

Conclusions

This study showed that the use of intravenous dexmedetomidine did not alter renal function in this cohort of relatively low-risk elective CABG patients although it was associated with an increase in urinary output as compared to placebo. Further trials are warranted to elucidate the effect of dexmedetomidine in high-risk patients.

Author details

1) Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; 2) Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Jorvi Hospital, Espoo, Finland; 3) Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; 4) Department of Pharmacology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; 5) Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Pulssi, Turku, Finland; 6) Department of Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland

Abbreviations

Defined in the text where first used.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank doctors Anne Kuitunen,3 Mika Valtonen,1 Juha Perttilä,1 Hannu Heikkilä5 and Timo Savunen6 as members of the Dexmedetomidine in Cardiac Surgery Study Group. We also thank Hughes associates, Oxford, UK, for providing medical writing services on behalf of Orion Pharma. Hugh associates was funded by Orion Pharma.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital
(2)
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Jorvi Hospital
(3)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Helsinki University Hospital
(4)
Department of Pharmacology, University of Turku

References

  1. Aantaa R, Jalonen J: Perioperative use of alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists and the cardiac patient. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006, 23: 361-372. 10.1017/S0265021506000378.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aantaa R, Jaakola ML, Kallio A, Kanto J: Reduction of the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane by dexmedetomidine. Anesthesiology. 1997, 86: 1055-1060. 10.1097/00000542-199705000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jalonen J, Hynynen M, Kuitunen A, Heikkilä H, Perttila J, Salmenpera M, Valtonen M, Aantaa R, Kallio A: Dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjunct in coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology. 1997, 86: 331-345. 10.1097/00000542-199702000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lawrence CJ, De Lange S: Effects of a single pre-operative dexmedetomidine dose on isoflurane requirements and peri-operative haemodynamic stability. Anaesthesia. 1997, 52: 736-744. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.169-az0303.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Herr DL, Sum-Ping ST, England M: ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003, 17: 576-584. 10.1016/S1053-0770(03)00200-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Venn M, Newman J, Grounds M: A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for sedation in the medical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2003, 29: 201-207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rosner MH, Portilla D, Okusa MD: Cardiac surgery as a cause of acute kidney injury: pathogenesis and potential therapies. J Intensive Care Med. 2008, 23: 3-18. 10.1177/0885066607309998.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gellai M, Ruffolo RR: Renal effects of selective alpha-1 and alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists in conscious, normotensive rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987, 240: 723-728.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. De Leeuw PW, Birkenhager WH: Alpha-adrenoceptors in the kidney. J Hypertens. 1988, 6 (Suppl): 21-24.Google Scholar
  10. Kulka PJ, Tryba M, Zenz M: Preoperative alpha sub 2-adrenergic receptor agonists prevent the deterioration of renal function after cardiac surgery: Results from a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 1996, 24: 947-952. 10.1097/00003246-199606000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Talke P, Richardson CA, Scheinin M, Fisher DM: Postoperative pharmacokinetics and sympatholytic effects of dexmedetomidine. Anesth Analg. 1997, 85: 1136-1142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Scheinin M, Koulu M, Laurikainen E, Allonen H: Hypokalemia and other non-bronchial effects of inhaled fenoterol and salbutamol: A placebo-controlled dose-response study in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987, 24: 645-653.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Ebert TJ, Hall JE, Barney JA, Uhrich TD, Colinco MD: The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Anesthesiology. 2000, 93: 382-394. 10.1097/00000542-200008000-00016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Alex J, Shah R, Griffin SC, Cale AR, Cowen ME, Guvendik L: Intensive care unit readmission after elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2005, 13: 325-329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Holzmann MJ, Ahnve S, Hammar N, Jorgensen L, Klerdal K, Pehrsson K, Ivert T: Creatinine clearance and risk of early mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005, 130: 746-752.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bove T, Calabro MG, Landoni G, Aletti G, Marino G, Crecsenzi G, Rosica C, Zangrillo A: The incidence and risk of acute renal failure after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004, 18: 442-445. 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.05.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Loef BG, Epema AH, Smilde TD, Henning RH, Ebels T, Navis G, Stegeman CA: Immediate postoperative renal function deterioration in cardiac surgical patients predicts in-hospital mortality and long-term survival. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005, 16: 195-200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Landoni G, Zangrillo A, Franco A, Aletti G, Roberti A, Calabro MG, Slaviero G, Bignami E, Marino G: Long-term outcome of patients who require renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006, 23: 17-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Luckraz H, Gravenor MB, George R, Taylir S, Williams A, Ashraf S, Argamo V, Youhana A: Long and short-term outcomes in patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy post cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005, 27: 906-909. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.01.057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Holzmann MJ, Ahnve S, Hammar N, Jorgensen L, Klerdal K, Pehrsson K, Ivert T: Creatinine clearance and risk of early mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005, 130: 746-752.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sear JW: Kidney dysfunction in the postoperative period. Br J Anaesth. 2005, 95: 20-32. 10.1093/bja/aei018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P, ADQI workgroup: Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004, 8: 204-212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hammer GB, Drover DR, Cao H, Jackson E, Williams GD, Ramamoorthy C, van Hare GF, Niksch A, Dubin AM: The effects of dexmedetomidine on cardiac electrophysiology in children. Anesth Analg. 2008, 106: 79-83. 10.1213/01.ane.0000297421.92857.4e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Addis T, Barrett E, Poo LJ, Ureen HJ, Lippman RW: The relation between protein consumption and diurnal variations of the endogenous creatinine clearance in normal individuals. J Clin Invest. 1951, 30: 206-209. 10.1172/JCI102433.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Frumento RJ, Logginidou HG, Wahlander S, Wagener G, Playford HR, Sladen RN: Dexmedtomidine infusion is associated with enhanced renal function after thoracic surgery. J Clin Anaesth. 2006, 18: 422-426. 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.02.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Rouch AJ, Kudo LH, Hebert C: Dexmedetomidine inhibits osmotic water permeability in the rat cortical collecting duct. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997, 281: 62-69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/11/9/prepub

Copyright

© Leino et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.